Epistemological anarchism is an epistemological theory advanced by Austrian philosopher of science Paul Feyerabend which holds that there are no useful and exception-free methodological rules governing the progress of science or the growth of knowledge. It holds that the idea of the operation of science by fixed, universal rules is unrealistic, pernicious, and detrimental to science itself.
The use of the term anarchism in the name reflected the methodological pluralism prescription of the theory, as the purported scientific method does not have a monopoly on truth or useful results. Feyerabend felt that science started as a liberating movement, but over time it had become increasingly dogmatic and rigid, and therefore had become increasingly an ideology and despite its successes science had started to attain some oppressive features and it was not possible to come up with an unambiguous way to distinguish science from religion, magic, or mythology. He felt the exclusive dominance of science as a means of directing society was authoritarian and ungrounded.Promulgation of the theory earned Feyerabend the title of “the worst enemy of science” from his detractors.
I believe a lot of people believe in a single epistemological methodology to create results.
But in my opinion a form of epistemological anarchism can combat things like consensuses and the tendancy that every model has to be compatible with existing models , I think this would increase diversity of methodologies and can encourage thinking outside the box more. I think this would only be successful if we applied anarchism to everyday life and reformed as a whole.
But I think something like this could definitely have helped transhumanism’s cause since most transhumanism is seen as pseudoscience for not being compatible with existing models