I touched on those possibilities in my thread
https://transforum.fractalfuture.net/t/superworld-superposition/2102
It’s indeed hard to grasp what it means, if one single world is the simultaneous simulation in to independent superworlds. When we are inside one of them, we would have simultaeously two different superworlds, and two different sets of gods. The rules for our afterlives would be different, too. Our who world remains in some kind of quantum superposition, until we eventually get in contact with our superworld, which would collapse that state of superposition, at least for the observers. It doesn’t even matter, if our world just happened to be a “base reality”. In that case, only the worlds that are simulations count, and we get our afterlives anyway.
Maybe it makes a sense to speak about how likely it is that a certain world is simulated by a certain kind of superworld. Is it the case that for each 10 reparationist simulators, we get 1 non-reparationist simulator, or rather the other way around? This would have consequences for the likeliness of being reincarnation in different kinds of afterlives.
That is a difficult question. You need to consider a couple of different kinds of suffering. First of all you have the direct suffering experiences by the sims. Then you may have empathic suffering that happens to the observers of the simulation. The existence of the latter imples that creating a simulation that contains suffering is ethically problematic, even if there exists a perfect copy of that simulation in a different world, or as base reality.
What if we could reduce that indirect empathic suffering to zero? In that case, the additional simulation would really not matter at all – until the point that you start to interact with that world, or reincarnate its inhabitants into your reality. Because in that situation you cause a bifurcation in the history of the enities of those worlds: Up until that point their histories in all simulations was identical. But now those histories diverse and you quickly get two different entities.
Yes, that’s a nice way of looking at suffering. One could however ask about the case that some kind of suffering quickly leads to death, and therefore makes all that was learned from that suffering irrelevant. The existence of afterlives counters that arguement. Even if an entity will die from a lethal experience, the knowledge that was learned from it, could still be injected into the reincarnated version of the entitiy.